Wednesday, April 21, 2010
ICE CONFIRMS EMPLOYERS HAVE TEN DAYS TO CORRECT TECHNICAL VIOLATIONS
Tracker I-9 reports that employers have ten days to correct non-substantive, technical violations after an ICE audit. ICE confirmed this policy in a recent meeting with representatives of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. According to Tracker:
In response to questions by AILA, ICE confirmed that penalties were still based on INS guidance from the late 1990s, which categorized I-9 errors into two groups: substantive verification failures, which are not subject to the ten-day correction period, and technical or procedural verification failures, which may be corrected. Substantive errors could arise, for example, when the employee fails to sign section 1 or forgets to check one of the boxes indicating his or her citizenship or immigration status. Technical or procedural violations tend to be more benign in nature including, for example, the failure of the employee to enter his or her maiden name, address, or birth date in Section 1 or failure of the employer to provide the title, business name, and business address in Section 2. It’s important to note, however, that an employer must have made a good faith effort to comply with the I-9 requirements in order to take advantage of the ten-day correction period. So if an employer repeatedly made mistakes in knowing reliance of the 10 day correction period or attempted to correct the errors by back-dating, ICE may very well fine them to the fullest extent.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:33 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
September 2012
December 2012
April 2014
In response to questions by AILA, ICE confirmed that penalties were still based on INS guidance from the late 1990s, which categorized I-9 errors into two groups: substantive verification failures, which are not subject to the ten-day correction period, and technical or procedural verification failures, which may be corrected. Substantive errors could arise, for example, when the employee fails to sign section 1 or forgets to check one of the boxes indicating his or her citizenship or immigration status. Technical or procedural violations tend to be more benign in nature including, for example, the failure of the employee to enter his or her maiden name, address, or birth date in Section 1 or failure of the employer to provide the title, business name, and business address in Section 2.It’s important to note, however, that an employer must have made a good faith effort to comply with the I-9 requirements in order to take advantage of the ten-day correction period. So if an employer repeatedly made mistakes in knowing reliance of the 10 day correction period or attempted to correct the errors by back-dating, ICE may very well fine them to the fullest extent.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 8:33 AM
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
September 2012
December 2012
April 2014
