Wednesday, July 8, 2009
WHITE HOUSE MAKES DECISIONS ON E-VERIFY AND NO-MATCH RULES
In short, the E-Verify federal contractor rule lives and the no-match rule dies.
The E-Verify contractor rule and the no-match rules were released in the tail end of the Bush Administration. The E-Verify rule would require most major federal contractors to use E-Verify in order to qualify for their contracts. The no-match rule covered situations where employers received letters from the Social Security Administration notifying them that employees social security numbers do not match their names. The rule outlined specific procedures for employers to follow after receiving such letters and the penalty for not following the procedures is a potential finding of knowingly hiring unauthorized workers.
Both rules have been blocked from implementation due to litigation. The Obama Administration needed to determine whether it wished to fight for either or both rules and today's press release from Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano made clear that the Administration will only fight for the contractor rule. A key sticking point in the litigation has been whether the rule's application of E-Verify to existing employees of a contractor should be permitted or whether only new employees should be put through the system. I have been told by insiders that a compromise on this issue was near, but this press release does not indicate whether a deal has been struck with the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
The press release says the White House is seeking implementation of the contractor rule beginning on September 8th.
# posted by Greg Siskind @ 9:38 AM
XML newsfeed
archives
April 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
September 2012
December 2012
April 2014
In short, the E-Verify federal contractor rule lives and the no-match rule dies.
The E-Verify contractor rule and the no-match rules were released in the tail end of the Bush Administration. The E-Verify rule would require most major federal contractors to use E-Verify in order to qualify for their contracts. The no-match rule covered situations where employers received letters from the Social Security Administration notifying them that employees social security numbers do not match their names. The rule outlined specific procedures for employers to follow after receiving such letters and the penalty for not following the procedures is a potential finding of knowingly hiring unauthorized workers.
Both rules have been blocked from implementation due to litigation. The Obama Administration needed to determine whether it wished to fight for either or both rules and today's press release from Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano made clear that the Administration will only fight for the contractor rule. A key sticking point in the litigation has been whether the rule's application of E-Verify to existing employees of a contractor should be permitted or whether only new employees should be put through the system. I have been told by insiders that a compromise on this issue was near, but this press release does not indicate whether a deal has been struck with the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
The press release says the White House is seeking implementation of the contractor rule beginning on September 8th.
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
April 2012
May 2012
September 2012
December 2012
April 2014